Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change inequality in ereal_{d,}nbhs and {p,n}infty_{d,}nbhs #487

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist commented Dec 4, 2021

  • from strict to large
  • also adds a few lemmas to ereal.v

closed #122 @CohenCyril

This is globally getting a bit bigger (only a few proofs are shortened).
I have maybe not been careful enough when updating.

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 0.3.12 milestone Dec 4, 2021
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.3.12, 0.3.13 Dec 28, 2021
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist changed the title change inequality in ereal_{d,}nbhs change inequality in ereal_{d,}nbhs and {p,n}infty_{d,}nbhs Jan 20, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.3.13, 0.3.14 Jan 24, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.4, 0.4.1 Feb 28, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.4.1, 0.4.2 Mar 22, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist force-pushed the ereal_dnbhs_nbhs branch 3 times, most recently from 55724fb to 919efcc Compare May 13, 2022 05:20
@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

IIRC, the problem with this PR is that it does not bring the expected code size reduction. But there is now code size augmentation (except with one lemma). Since we all seem to agree that large inequalities fell better suited, we can maybe merge this PR for now. What do you think?

@CohenCyril
Copy link
Member

I think this PR essentially exibits a lack of abstraction. We should actually understand how to make the code smaller, and I think it might not be about changing the def.

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.5.1, 0.5.2 May 17, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.5.2, 0.5.3 Jul 3, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist force-pushed the ereal_dnbhs_nbhs branch 3 times, most recently from afd2f59 to cdacbaf Compare July 11, 2022 03:31
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.5.3, 0.5.4 Jul 29, 2022
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.0.1 milestone Jan 24, 2024
@proux01 proux01 added the TODO: MC2 port This PR must be ported to mathcomp 2 now that the. Remove this label when the port is done. label Jan 25, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.0.1, 1.2.0 Mar 14, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.2.0, 1.3.0 Jun 3, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.3.0, 1.4.0 Jul 24, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist force-pushed the ereal_dnbhs_nbhs branch 2 times, most recently from b719baa to 2b10bdc Compare August 13, 2024 08:36
@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

NB: after a rebase on MathComp 1.3.1, the proofs of the lemmas open_ereal_lt_ereal and open_ereal_gt_ereal in normedtype.v rely on internals (to fix)

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist removed the TODO: MC2 port This PR must be ported to mathcomp 2 now that the. Remove this label when the port is done. label Aug 13, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist force-pushed the ereal_dnbhs_nbhs branch 6 times, most recently from 572778e to 3b9c43b Compare August 13, 2024 10:22
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.4.0, 1.5.0 Sep 19, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.5.0, 1.6.0 Oct 8, 2024
- from strict to large
- also in {p,n}infty_{d,}nbhs

closed #122
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.6.0, 1.7.0 Oct 24, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.7.0, 1.8.0 Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
experiment 🧪 This issue/PR is very experimental
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants